Comments of particular interest are noted with ‘*’.
- Lithium: South American miners are struggling to put downstream added value projects into place.
- The USA – China tariff talks & trade wars The recent “phase 1” agreement details have yet to see the light of day.
- Base metal inventories continue to remain tight. Low base metal inventories are beginning to get more attention in the media than previously.
*Copper Strikes in Peru to affect output. RIO exploring (JV) in China.
Cobalt GEM Co agreement with Glencore for provision of cobalt hydroxide. Supply is ‘precarious’.
*Nickel Ni market is concerned about potential future supply shortfalls.
Zinc & Lead ZMI hits high grade Zn. NCZ achieves stable Zn operation. EPA lead pipe rules changed.
*Tin Chinese refined Sn output down on reduced feedstock supply. Conflict minerals’ compliance.
Aluminium A gap between alumina prices in China and in rest-of-world. Alunorte returns to production.
Gold High gold price dampens Indian buying ahead of Diwali festival. The world is nervous.
Platinum & Palladium Merger agreed for Implats to acquire North American Platinum.
Oil Attacks on Iranian tanker escalates issues. USA to send troops to Saudi Arabia.
Coal Aust coking coal exports increased. Chinese buyers acting ahead of expected port restrictions.
Iron Ore China’s Tangshan city extended steel production restrictions, that may favour lump iron ore.
Shipping New fuel regulations making freight rates more volatile.
*Lithium: supply chain issues for South American countries.
Port Hedland Iron Ore: China extended restrictions on steel mills that may favour lump ore..
*PinchPoint Graphs: tightening further and beginning to get price responses.
*Japan – LNG prices: Higher oil prices and ship-fuel costs could boost LNG prices further.
An article from Petroleum Economist (italics are Matau Advisory’s emphasis) is below.
Note that the article’s assumptions are that by 2050, 100% of cars in UK will be electric. My limited imagination suggests that is a big ask. Thus the required increase in demand for critical commodities will appear dramatic.
Note also that BHP and BP assume that EVs may achieve 40% of market share by 2040.
Matau’s thinking is that with the time constraints on discovery, evaluation, permitting, construction and commissioning of new projects being approximately 6-10 years (with the average skewed to the longer term), that supply of the critical commodities, (lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel, copper, manganese) to battery factories at the very high forecast growth rates (+20% p.a. for ~ 10 years from 2020) will seriously constrain growth rates, to likely less than 10% p.a., based on current new mine production growth rates, and even that supply growth rate will be a challenge. i.e. that the EV uptake will be limited by supply of critical materials.
It is not so much the political stability of the jurisdiction, rather the process from discovery to delivery (anywhere in the world).
That commodity supply thematic also applies if enthusiasts want to displace Li-ion batteries with a different battery construction that may include say vanadium, zinc-air, et al.
There may be scope for new technology to improve recoveries of some of the key elements from existing operations, though these technologies have yet to be identified and or applied.
This article refers to the logistics for delivery of power supply for EV’s to the UK. Many other countries have lower population densities, spread over larger areas, which suggests to Matau that the greatest uptakes are likely to be within major cities. Also many large cities have created their own (polluted / photo-chemical smog) microclimates that a high level of EV uptake could alleviate, including examples such as Los Angeles.
Matau applauds the development and adoption of EV’s though considers that careful thought and management of expectations is required.
EV revolution could stall due to mineral shortages
More planning is required to ensure adequate supply, researchers say
A potential shortage of minerals needed to produce the billions of batteries required to power electric vehicles (EVs) risks slowing down the transition from internal combustion engines (ICEs) to cleaner forms of transport, according to a team of UK-based scientists.
Researchers working on the Security of Supply of Mineral Resources (SOS Minerals) multi-institution research programme, partly funded by the UK government, have crunched the numbers and come up with some daunting-looking headline figures.
They looked at the amount of minerals required to make all cars and vans in the UK electric by 2050—based on the current UK fleet size of some 31.5mn vehicles—and for all new sales to be purely battery electric by 2035. Both are recommendations contained in a report by the parliamentary Committee on Climate Change (CCC). In early June, these were being considered for adoption by the UK government, whose current pledge is limited to eliminating ICE sales by 2040.
The team concluded that just to meet these UK targets, assuming the vehicles use next-generation NMC 811 batteries, would require just under two times the world’s total annual cobalt production, nearly all world production of neodymium, three quarters of the world’s lithium production and at least half of the world’s copper production, based on 2018 data.
Just ensuring that EVs meet UK demand for new cars and vans from 2035, would require the UK to import the equivalent of European industry’s entire cobalt consumption, according to a letter sent to the CCC in early June. It was signed by Richard Herrington, head of the Earth Sciences department at London’s Natural History Museum, and other scientists involved in the SOS Minerals programme.
Scaling that up to a global level would, of course, be an even a greater challenge. By 2050, some forecasts predict, there will be at least 2bn cars on the world’s roads. Herrington estimates that if all of those were to be EVs, annual production of neodymium and dysprosium would need to increase by 70% and stay at that level until 2050. On the same basis, annual copper output would need to more than double and cobalt output would need to increase by at least 3.5 times to meet global demand.
Herrington told Petroleum Economist that increasing minerals production to meet the envisaged increase in the EV fleet—as well as for the additional renewable energy and storage infrastructure required to power the fleet and extract the minerals—would be challenging but not impossible.
“[The ambition] is laudable, and it could be plausible. but it needs greater thought as to where those materials might come from,” he said.
Many of the rare earths and other minerals used for batteries are mined in politically unstable parts of the world, such as parts of sub-Saharan Africa. Herrington believes they could be sourced closer to the main EV markets, providing greater security of supply, as well as boosting overall production. That includes Europe, where, for example, more cobalt could be recovered from copper mines than is currently the case, if new technologies were deployed, he said.
The increase in renewable energy infrastructure needed to provide power for EVs would also consume more metals and minerals. Wind turbines require a lot of steel, while solar panel installations consume several scarce minerals, such as high purity silicon, indium, tellurium and gallium. Extracting the minerals themselves is also a power-hungry process, adding to demand.
Then there are the transmission lines needed to connect them to the grid. Herrington notes that a power station requires fewer copper-based cables than hooking up the hundreds of wind turbines required to produce the same amount of power.
“You could be more aggressive with carbon capture and still continue with hydrocarbons to generate power,” he said.
However, given the faltering progress of efforts to get carbon capture and storage moving in the UK and elsewhere in the world, for now, this technology seems unlikely to be able to play more than a bit part in efforts to allow coal and gas to play a long-term role in the energy sector.
Herrington does not believe the potential minerals supply crunch necessarily means the world will have to use more oil for longer in the transport sector.
“I don’t think we have to. We just have to make sure that we gear up, so that the alternatives are available in the quantities that we want,” he said.
This week’s comments of particular interest are noted with ‘*’.
*Copper BHP requests Chilean govt mediation at Escondida. Workers at Codelco’s Chuquicamata on strike.
*Cobalt Diverse end-uses. Demand growth to 2030 from EVs and stationary batteries is strong.
*Nickel Ni miners market optimism has increased, more so for sulphide producers.
Zinc & Lead NCZ resumed operations at Century Zn mine in Qld. WA EPA approves Paroo Stn Pb mine.
Tin Reuters discontinues its NY spot tin price publication.
Aluminium Strike at Alcoa (Australia) and potential Rusal (Russia) shutdowns.
Gold Potential interest in Au, regarding Turkey’s TRY collapse and USA sanctions on Turkey.
Platinum & Palladium Political storm brewing in Sth Africa over Implats’ decision to cut costs, jobs and production.
Oil IEA raised demand outlook and supply of non-OPEC oil.
*Coal pot prices for SSCC & LVPCI are below Newcastle thermal!. Market is out of wack!
*Iron Ore China’s imported iron ore market gradually stabilize after unexpected rally this week.
Shipping Cape & Panamax rates down this week.
*Battery Minerals – Cobalt, Lithium, Graphite and Rare Earths: Summaries of supply.
*PinchPoint updates: Most metals (except Sn) are pushing toward volatile ‘noses’ of their curves.
*Port Hedland – Iron Ore shipments: India increasing imports markedly.
Japan – LNG Prices: increased ‘contract’ and ‘arrival’ prices.